Google Search
Search results · category pages
Buyers now move between search results, AI answers, reviews and third-party sources before reaching your website. Visibility on one surface does not guarantee visibility on another. Nortav maps how these systems connect—and where your brand disappears from the journey.
5 source classes
Here are several enterprise backlog planning options:
Search results · category pages
Peer discussion · recommendations
Reference coverage · category context
Content · product evidence
Comparisons · market reports
01
SEO foundations
01
Technical search health
02
Intent & demand mapping
03
Content architecture
04
Internal linking & entities
05
Authority & source quality
02
AI-search visibility
01
Prompt-set benchmarking
02
Mention & citation tracking
03
Competitor share of voice
04
Cited-source analysis
05
Brand & entity representation
Three-month pilot
+10 percentage points
5.643× average citations
Read the case study ↗
Baseline and measurement scope
Fixed diagnosis available
Prioritized decision framework
Separately agreed delivery scope

FROM THE FOUNDER
I’m Anas, founder of Nortav. I created Nortav to give clients a clearer view of what is changing, why it matters and which actions deserve priority.
I work directly on the research, strategy and decisions throughout each engagement, so context is not lost between the first conversation and delivery.
Anas Naam-Allah
Founder & Lead SEO/AEO Specialist at Nortav.
Focused on LLM retrieval, topical authority and generative search.
Practical guidance on measurement, collaboration and what an initial review can and cannot establish.
Clients may approach Nortav specifically for GEO or AEO. AI-answer visibility still depends partly on technical accessibility, content quality, entity clarity, authority and the third-party sources that corroborate a brand. Much of the underlying work therefore overlaps with SEO, while the diagnostic questions, prompt sets, benchmarks and reporting outputs differ. The right scope depends on the baseline and the commercial objective.
No. Rankings, citations, traffic, leads and revenue are outcomes within external systems that Nortav does not control. The work establishes a measurable baseline, identifies evidence-backed priorities, tests informed changes and records what happened. That creates a clearer basis for decisions without pretending that Nortav can promise a specific ranking, citation or commercial result.
Nortav monitors a controlled set of relevant prompts and records brand mentions, citation frequency, cited URLs, answer position, share of voice and competitor presence. These observations measure inclusion without assuming a click occurred. Referral sessions from identifiable AI platforms are assessed separately in GA4, while conversions and pipeline data provide additional commercial context rather than perfect attribution.
Platform selection depends on how the client’s buyers research and on the agreed scope. An assessment may include Google Search, Google AI features, ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, but Nortav does not promise blanket coverage of every platform. The review focuses on the surfaces and prompt categories most relevant to the buying journey.
Yes. Nortav can work alongside an internal marketing, SEO or content team, or complement an existing agency. The role may be to diagnose gaps, provide specialist support, validate priorities or deliver a clearly defined implementation scope. An engagement does not require replacing the people or partners already responsible for search and content.
The initial review produces a prioritized roadmap and a decision framework grounded in the agreed baseline. The client can implement the recommendations internally, use existing partners or agree a separate delivery scope with Nortav. Continued work is recommended only when the evidence, expected value and capacity to implement justify it.